296: The Spanish Grid Goes Down: Are renewables really to blame?
This week, we dig into the major blackout that hit Spain and Portugal back in April - and ask what it really tells us about the transition to renewables.
About this episode
On April 28th, millions of people across Spain, Portugal and beyond were plunged into darkness in one of Europe’s most severe blackouts in decades. Was it a cyberattack? A renewables failure? Or might things be a little more complex?
This week, Tom Rivett-Carnac, Christiana Figueres, and Paul Dickinson dig into what we know, what we don’t, and ask what this blackout really tells us about the transition to renewables. They speak with energy strategist Kingsmill Bond of Ember and hear an on-the-ground account from José Manuel Entrecanales, CEO of global renewables leader Acciona, to build a picture of how our grids function – and how they fail.
Plus: what can we say when friends or colleagues claim that ‘renewables aren’t reliable’? And, after our recent conversations reflecting on the legacy of Pope Francis, what might Pope Leo XIV mean for future climate leadership?
Learn more
🔌 Ember’s report, ‘Energy Security in an Insecure World’
🎧 Octopus CEO Greg Jackson interviewed on the Azeem Azhar’s Exponential View podcast
💡 Simon Evans’s analysis for Carbon Brief on the role of gas in electricity pricing
🌐 The IEA’s report, ‘Electricity Grids and Secure Energy Transitions’
🌳 ‘Pope Francis was a passionate climate advocate. Will Pope Leo XIV continue his legacy?’ in EuroNews
Follow us on social media for behind the scenes moments and to watch our videos:
Instagram @outrageoptimism
LinkedIn @outrageoptimism
Or get in touch with us via this form.
Producer: Ben Weaver-Hincks
Video Producer: Caitlin Hanrahan
Exec Producer: Ellie Clifford
Commissioning Editor: Sarah Thomas
This is a Persephonica production for Global Optimism and is part of the Acast Creator Network.
Full Transcript
Tom : [00:00:02] Hello and welcome to Outrage and Optimism. I'm Tom Rivett-Carnac
Christiana: [00:00:05] I'm Christiana Figueres
Paul: [00:00:06] And I'm Paul Dickinson.
Tom : [00:00:08] This week we talk about the potential climate leadership of a new pope. And we ask what really happened in the recent blackout that impacted Spain and Portugal. Thanks for being here. Hi, friends. So the main thing we want to get to today is the recent blackouts that swept across the Iberian Peninsula a couple of weeks ago, and there's been so much chatter in the last couple of weeks about really what was the cause and disinformation and information. We'll get into all of that in a minute. But first of all, Cristiana, a couple of weeks ago, you recorded a beautiful tribute to Pope Francis, who, of course passed away, where you read out parts of the Profiles of Paris submission that he gave us around the work that went into creating the Paris Agreement. And, of course, the Pope was a remarkable leader on climate change. He really provided spiritual direction, depth, vision in a manner that was enormously helpful. And it's been a big question. Who were we going to get to replace it? So I thought, first of all, before we kick off, we should just look a little bit for a minute at Pope Leo the 14th, who was recently nominated by the conclave to be the new pope. I'm going to dive in a little bit into what he's previously said on climate, but would either of you like to start with any comments?
Christiana: [00:01:18] Well, the two pillars that we saw being constantly interwoven by the previous pope on his opinion on climate were nature and poverty, because both of those were so important to him. He chose his name because he felt very, very close to nature, and he felt a true sense of responsibility to protect creation, to use his term. But he also understood that if we don't protect nature, that it is actually going to hurt the poor much more than the top of the pyramid. He understood that very clearly. And so his allegiance to both. Alleviation of poverty and to protecting nature is what kept him so close to climate issues. Will that carry over to the new pope? We don't know.
Tom : [00:02:16] We don't know. And one of the things you learn as soon as you look into this is that who people have been before they become pope is not necessarily who they are as pope. And that's true even of Francis, who was much more conservative in many of his views before he became head of the Catholic Church, at which point he, of course, as you say, became such a remarkable leader. Now, there's a few things to say here, though. The new pope, the first with a US passport that is historic in and of itself, and quite interesting when you consider the fact that one of the things Francis did precipitate was a bit of a pushback from us Catholics who felt that he was too aligned to liberal issues. So that's interesting whether he will be able to reach out more and be a more compelling message even than Francis to us Catholics. But he has over the years really advocated for environmental advocacy. Just a couple of years ago, he has been emphasizing the urgency of the transition and in particular saying we need to move from words to action on climate. He has pointed out that the moral responsibility to care for the environment is about a respectful and reciprocal relationship with nature. Looking at the interconnectedness of poverty and social crises and the environmental issues, he has been leading much of the work at the Vatican to adopt solar panels and electric vehicles, transition their endowments. And he's also, of course, spent much of his life in Peru and has shown a strong commitment to protecting the Amazon rainforest and supporting indigenous communities. So all of those factors can make us very hopeful that this will be a pope that continues that legacy of leadership. But as you say, Christiana, we just don't know who he will become now that he's in that role.
Paul: [00:03:56] This sort of extraordinary juxtaposition of 2 billion people of faith in the Catholic Church taking very seriously the the leadership of somebody whose role is to help us think holistically and and comprehensively with the juxtaposition of the the US president issuing a photoshopped picture of himself as pope. You know, I mean, he's always grabbing the headlines by being kind of an idiot, but it does sort of emphasize childishness versus the the serious and important issues of humanity behaving towards itself and, and broader nature in life with respect and dignity.
Paul: [00:04:32] Mhm.
Tom : [00:04:33] Yeah. And of course, using his first mass, which happened just this previous Sunday to call for an end to war, there's just a lot of positives there that we have not lost. Of course we've lost a great pope, but maybe we still have the moral leadership that we so desperately need because of course, it's kind of a thin list when you look at those people who can really call power to account on the global stage. So just to kick this off, I'm sure all listeners will be aware of this at a top end. But on the 28th of April, a massive power outage swept across the Iberian Peninsula, affecting millions of people in one of the most severe blackouts in European history. Within just five seconds, Spain lost approximately 15GW of power, around 60% of its national electricity supply, causing a chain reaction that also disrupted parts of Portugal, southern France and Andorra. This blackout hit major urban centers and disrupted transport emergency services. And honestly, the cause is still under investigation. But some early reports suggest a fault in the high voltage transmission lines that triggered cascading failures. However, at the time of the outage, renewables made up 64% of Spain's electricity generation. And as ever again in these critical moments, those interests who want to try to slow down the transition to renewable grids and shift away from fossil fuels were very quick to pounce on that and say, the cause here is renewables. It's the intermittent nature of sources like wind and solar. To try to suggest this is more complicated and difficult than we thought. So let's get into this. And of course we should stay at the top end. There is an investigation ongoing. There are multiple potential causes that may be identified definitively through the investigation as to what really caused this. And we're having this conversation in advance of that report coming out. So we don't really know Christiana. I know that for many years, you sat on the board of a large Spanish renewable energy company. I wonder if we can speak to anyone there about this.
Christiana: [00:06:27] Well, indeed. How did you know?
Tom : [00:06:31] Because you always seem to be in Madrid whenever I was talking to you.
Christiana: [00:06:35] Yeah, I did reach out to Jose Manuel Canales, who is the CEO of both Acciona and Acciona in it here. And it is headquartered in Spain, multinational small conglomerate which is dedicated to the development and management of infrastructure and energy, but only renewable energy, operating in about 40 countries of the world and produces. Last I saw about 21 terawatt hours of renewable electricity around the world and is the major producer of renewable energy in Spain and on the Iberian Peninsula. So I did reach out to him because I do remember being on the board of Acciona. How many times? Many times. Jose Manuel said, you know, the bane of our existence is not producing energy. It's transporting energy. Because these companies that produce electricity, they're not responsible for transporting it. They depend on these grids that we've been talking about. And he was constantly saying, we will reach a moment in which these grids will collapse in front of us. And that is as far as we will be able to go until there is decent investment into the grids. I don't know how many times I heard that from him, so I did reach out to him to ask him what is his opinion about what happened with these blackouts, and does this prove the point that he has been arguing for so many years? Here's what he said.
Jose Manuel Canales: [00:08:16] It's a hugely complex situation that I am in. Not a very good position to make because of course, I'm not the grid operator, I'm just Acciona. It's just a generator. So what I'm giving you is my own assessment of the events, information that I'm gathering from around the place, from the technicians and specialists, and it will take. Now they're saying it's going to take about six months to clarify Exactly what happened and why it happened. Let me just run very briefly and in general terms over the over the course of events. It was a sunny day, so we were generating about 65% from renewables, mostly from PV. In fact, we've had a number of days where we were generating over 80%. So that was a normal, a normal situation. Now, half hours before the blackout, the European system operators had experience to over tension, over power and over frequency events, which didn't actually they didn't give a lot of importance. It wasn't. I mean, they managed to cover out those distortions in the in the grid and nothing really too serious happened. And I don't know if the fact that they occurred in a couple of hours or within the hour before the blackout has anything to do with the blackout. Honestly, I don't know. Now what did happen and what it seems. The reason for the falling of the castle of cards is a disconnection of over 2000MW of generation capacity. We believe in Extremadura in the south of Spain.
Jose Manuel Canales: [00:09:59] It's believed that the disconnection occurred there. So over 2000MHz of we believe. Then again, not absolutely sure PV disconnected. The reason why those generation facilities disconnected from the grid. No one really knows. And in fact, that is the main objective of the current investigations. So if and when these two plants disconnect, there's a sudden tension peak in the grid in Extremadura. And we're entering the area of my own opinion. It may be that the connection between the generation points Extremadura and the south, when there's a lot of PV, because a lot sunnier, of course, and the demand points in the North is actually somewhat a tense grid because a lot of electricity is flowing from the south towards the north. Now, that may have created an over tension situation, and it may have contributed to the falling of other regions, other generation points. Whether the 2.2 disconnection in Extremadura should have been isolated. That is a very good question, but I do don't have an answer. I don't think anyone has an answer. At least there's no public answer. Onto why that wasn't isolated. One would think that we should be able to manage a 2.2GW disconnection in a network that's actually generating 32GW. Anyway, the whole thing started falling and we had to disconnect many of our plants, all of our plants, because there was the system had completely it was completely unbalanced. So we had to disconnect and the whole system fell apart.
Jose Manuel Canales: [00:11:51] It's remarkable, however, how fast the protocols of reconnection and reloading started and how efficient that was by one, actually. We re-energised the Morocco Spain line by 135. Spain and France. Interconnection was re-established and by say 4:00, which is quite surprisingly fast, at least to me. Portugal was stabilizing its network, restarting its network, and the connection was started in Spain. So by midnight, most of us had power. I think that was quite remarkable. To be totally honest, I don't think there's been huge Damage in the event other than the using of this event to criticize renewables. The truth is, this is my own very personal comment here. Politically incorrect too. I think it's actually good that we remember how important having a continuous supply of electricity is for a society, so that we don't take it for granted, and that we realize how lucky we are to have a constant flow of electricity coming into a system which, by the way, doesn't happen in that many countries anymore. And in the Spanish case, where we're generating, in normal circumstances, 60% of our needs from renewable sources or creating a huge degree of energy independence and affordable energy prices is a blessing that cannot be in any way tarnished by this event. Let's not use it as a political or a ideological tool because it's a very technical, it's a very technical event which needs to be analyzed over the next few months.
Tom : [00:13:45] Christiana, thank you so much for getting an analyst to send that in. I mean, how interesting to have a direct assessment from someone so deeply involved. And clearly there's a lot more to learn in the coming weeks and months as we try and identify the true causes here and how we find a path forward. But which of you would like to kick off with a few thoughts about what's really going on here and how we should respond?
Christiana: [00:14:04] Yeah. So as Jose Manuel Gonzalez explains, the investigation into the blackout is ongoing and it could take a while to finally understand what happened. In the meantime, it might be helpful to begin to soften or maybe even dispel some of the rumors surrounding the blackout. One immediate rumor that was spread is that it was a cyberattack. Well, we won't know for sure until the investigation concludes, but for the time being, there is no evidence that there was a cyber or terrorist attack. Another rumor that was spread by those opposed to the energy transition is that it was due to the high participation of renewable energy in the Spanish electric grid. Once again, we have to wait for the conclusion of the investigation. But the fact is that Spain frequently has even higher percentage of renewable energy than that which was on the day of the blackout, and that renewable energy flows through the grid system. And Spain has never had an overall blackout. Even with higher percentages of renewable energy. So it is possible that the blackout will eventually find its source in a technical failure, or a series of failures within the complex system of electricity transportation, rather than with any source of generation of electricity. Now, just to clarify, electricity is produced at many point sources from many different types of fuel and renewable energies.
Christiana: [00:16:00] Usually the production of electricity. That generation is far away from the places where it is actually needed or consumed. So the electric grid is a complex system that takes the electricity from where it is generated to where it is needed or used, and an electric grid is made up of both transmission lines and distribution lines. Transmission lines are built to transport high voltage electricity over long distances. And distribution lines are built for short distance, low voltage delivery of electricity. To homes and buildings. The entire grid system, including the purchase of electricity from generators, the transport over long distances, the delivery over short distances to final users, and the sale of excess energy when excess is being produced and is on the grid network. All of that needs to be in balance, and that balance needs to exist for the grid to maintain its stability. When that balance is lost, inbuilt protection systems of the grid network automatically disconnect. In order to safeguard the infrastructure. But grid operators are usually technically prepared for only one element failing. So two or more technical failures of the Spanish grid and its interconnection to neighbouring Portugal, Morocco and France is one likely explanation of what happened on the Iberian Peninsula. But once again, we have to wait for the investigation results
Paul: [00:17:47] That's a brilliant summary, Christiana, and I know you have quite some experience of the industry. In fact. I mean, I'm just dazzled by one fact here, which is that at the time of the outage, renewables made up roughly 64% of Spain's electricity generation. And I don't think they were at fault. But we should just celebrate that amazing number 64% of an entire nation's electricity coming completely for free from the sun and the wind. Now, there are issues around this, and they're not necessarily intermittency. There was no evidence that intermittency was necessarily the problem in Spain. But just as Christiana says, the power grid has not moved with time and I'm at a sort of meta level. I'm fascinated that in decades of working on climate change, how little grids have really come up as a regular topic of discussion. And I think the main reason for that is because they sit very often behind a central national government, and there'll be a sort of ministry for oversight of electricity. And, you know, just as your friends or neighbors might put solar on their roof or have an electric car, that's something very tangible about climate change. We can all see wind farms, you know, in the sea or on the land or something. The grid is sort of invisible, both economically and politically and technologically. And so we don't think about it so much. But it is an absolutely fascinating machine. It's very complex in some ways. But I mean, principally, it's had big generators for the last hundred plus years, rotating, producing this power in a kind of regulated way.
Paul: [00:19:23] And of course, when you have a solar farm, for example, there isn't a big generator. There's actually just electricity coming out of the solar farm, and it's going into what people call an inverter, and then it's going on to the grid. And so a couple of issues that we're realizing now are that grids, first of all, just as Christiana said, with this two way electricity, they need to have kind of technological oversight, for want of a better word. They need to have information so that the national control of the grid can deal with all these different sources. And they need battery storage. Um, there's some evidence that, um, there wasn't as much storage necessarily in Spain as, as there is, for example, in the UK. And that's often to do with market instruments that it's much more profitable to be running storage commercially in the UK, and you can sell at higher prices and make more money and that that gets more investment. I mean, there could be, as you know, as much as up to ten times more battery storage in the UK than Spain simply because of market mechanisms. Organisms. But I think above all, it's really just having a way for our societies to prioritise the extraordinary potential of this. And, you know, there was a great interview, actually, with the chief executive of Octopus Energy, Greg Jackson, that I listened to, and he was pointing out that, you know, electric vehicles, for example, are sort of five times cheaper than than petrol vehicles, depending on what cost you buy the power at.
Paul: [00:20:42] I mean, there's certainly at least half the price of petrol vehicles in terms of fuel costs. That fact means that the petrol cars are on their way out. You know, everyone across the world will tell you how important gas prices are for vehicles. You know, it's like a political factor in US elections. So the fact that we've got a car that runs on half the price for energy means that we're going to have more and more electric vehicles. Now, on the one hand, that's more and more demands on the grid, more and more opportunity for renewable energy to give us free electricity. And as Christiana pointed out, more and more opportunity actually for millions of cars to provide us with gigantic batteries, and we can solve the problem of a modern grid. But just to finish on this explanatory journey, it's a very, very different grid in 2025 to 1 in 1925, when 1925 you got big rotating generators at about ten power stations that power your country. And in 2025, I spoke to somebody from E.ON who says they've got 45 million people on their grid. They're connecting a new customer or generator every eight seconds. So, you know, the modern grid is a super complex, super devolved. And I think we can all I'm personally enjoying starting to go deep into grids because it's part of actual national energy strategy. And, you know, whether you become a kind of a successful electro state with, you know, low cost energy is in part dependent upon your grid and how you develop your grid.
Tom : [00:22:09] Definitely, definitely. And I think, Paul, the interesting thing that you said there about the different and you, Christiana, the different nature of grids now a hundred years later with distributed generation and what that looks like, I think that's such a key point. But I would just complement that with an additional point, which is to say that even if we weren't in some fantasy world shifting to renewables, the traditional grids are already too old and would require investment and transformation. So to expect the transition to renewables to cover the entire cost of this new grid and to place the responsibility of that on renewables, when this legacy grid was actually created through public funding that then enabled everybody to get connected to the grid in the early days, is to use economics in a manner to disadvantage this transformation, because many of those costs would be baked in anyway. I think that's kind of an important point. Now, I wonder if we should call a real expert who can help us think this through. And I wonder if what you both think about Kingsmill bond. So Kingsmill is yeah. Yeah is brilliant and is known to both of you and to many listeners as a former guest on this podcast. He was formerly at RMI, the Rocky Mountain Institute, and he's now an energy strategist at Ember, leading their Energy Futures initiative.
Tom : [00:23:28] He analyzes the future of the energy system as it transitions from fossil fuels to renewables. 25 years of experience as a financial market analyst. What Kingsmill is so compelling about, and this speaks to his very impressive career, is just really nailing the unstoppable nature of this transition and the underlying dynamics that make it possible. So maybe we should just give him a quick call and then we can see what we learned from the conversation. Please join us in a moment. Kingsmill, how are you doing? Welcome back to the podcast. Thanks very much for having me. We're really, really appreciate you hopping on at short notice. There's so many things that we can talk about, as evidenced by our previous conversations, which have been very popular on outrage and optimism, but particularly today, we wanted to dig into some issues around what's been happening in Spain. So I'll just hop in if that's all right. We're now two weeks past these blackouts. What have you been hearing about how industry insiders have been talking about the blackouts, and how has that changed over the last couple of weeks?
Kingsmill Bond: [00:24:27] So the Initial thing we heard was for all the fossil fuel folk, some shouting about how it was the fault of renewables.
Tom : [00:24:33] That came quickly and loudly. I had my memory of that.
Kingsmill Bond: [00:24:35] Yeah.
Paul: [00:24:36] Preparation is everything right?
Kingsmill Bond: [00:24:38] Yeah. And without any evidence at that stage. And, you know, here we are two weeks later and we still don't actually know in detail what has caused this blackout, which is quite remarkable. But there is a you know, there's a wider issue, which is that we do need to enhance the stability and the capacity of our grids everywhere to resist this kind of outage. I should say that we should also not forget that we've been having grid outages in many countries ever since the technology was invented 120 years ago. So, you. Load MoreTom : [00:25:13] Know, the grid technology?
Kingsmill Bond: [00:25:15] Yeah. So it's not as if this is an incredibly complex machine. People call it the most complex machine that humanity has ever devised, and therefore it has been breaking down in many locations for many reasons, for many years. So suddenly to start pinning this on solar and wind as the fossil fuel folks are seeking to do is certainly inappropriate. Hmm.
Tom : [00:25:36] So on that, I mean, if you were if you were sort of a person who is paying casual attention to news items as they as they come and go, honestly, you would be forgiven for thinking that this is solar and wind, because that's the narrative that's been put out, as you just said, so clearly by certain actors who try to claim this is to do with unreliability of renewables. So talk us through what else causes grids to be intermittent and create blackouts.
Kingsmill Bond: [00:26:01] So there are many reasons why grids will go down. So, you know, if a nuclear power station suddenly goes offline or you get a sudden surge in demand or you get a cyber attack, for example. All different reasons why grids might fail or you simply don't have enough, um, supply to meet the demand at the moment. So there are many reasons why grids fail, and there's no particular reason why renewables actually make it harder. In fact, in many ways, don't forget renewables are a wonderful solution to enhance grid stability because of course they are local and distributed and everywhere. And to a degree, one of the things we need to be doing over the next few years is to be improving our software and our capacity to use these local resources, and this course is happening. And I think one of the arguments that's been made about Spain is that Spain could have done with a lot more batteries, because if you have enough batteries in enough locations, then that also enhances your capacity to handle spikes in supply and demand. So again, the lesson to be drawn from this episode, we'll wait and see in detail. But one of the lessons, surely, is that we need to be enhancing our improving our grid enhancing technologies, installing more batteries and improving our software, and improving our ways of harnessing local solar and wind resources.
Tom : [00:27:23] Okay, so so that's very helpful. But just to sort of play devil's advocate because it's in people's minds, I mean, Spain and Portugal have a lot of renewables on the grid at the moment, I understand. So that's why that narrative kind of lands with people, right. And they say, okay, well, there can be a lot of reasons, but this is highly correlated to a place where a lot of renewables are coming online. Is there not a case that actually, I know I realize I'm pushing this point, but I just I know this the question people are coming at is they're not a reality that actually, you know, maybe there's a limit to how many renewables we can put on the grid. Maybe. Actually, we've all been living in a fancy land thinking we can shift to wind and solar, and that might be true for a certain percentage, but these spikes are systemically Be unmanageable. We need to make sure we still have these other forms of energy on the grid that can be turned on and off, and we energy transition ists have been pie eyed idealists as we try to think that we can go any further than than a small amount.
Kingsmill Bond: [00:28:16] Clearly enjoyed this by the idealist. So, Tom, I mean, you hardly need to be reminded that, um, this is a long standing argument. So 20 years ago, there were these famous letters sent to the Irish Times by, uh, people in the Irish energy system saying that the grid cannot possibly ever handle more than 5% solar and wind. And a similar debate was held in Germany, and incumbents established interest for a very long time. Have argued that renewables cannot possibly supply more than a certain percentage of the ceiling is is constantly rising, but they think it's a fixed amount. In reality, we just keep on innovating and, you know, go and talk to the folks in northern Germany or South Australia where you're getting solar and wind already now starting supply well over 75% of electricity. So it is just a question of figuring it out and figuring it out more effectively. You are bound to have problems along the way. But that's not to say that these problems are not any worse than the problems you would have faced with the previous system. And again, there's these counterfactuals. One can one could debate.
Kingsmill Bond: [00:29:21] But it's very important to realize that there are many countries and regions where actually solar and wind are far higher than what's what's been achieved in Spain and Portugal. And they've been incredibly efficient. I mean, northern Germany always brings to mind with their 5 or 6 nines efficiency. So I don't think that is the right conclusion to me. The right conclusion is that we need to continue to improve the way we deploy these new technologies. And then the final point I guess to make is no one's suggesting that there's not a role for some residual fossil fuels on the system. Why not? I mean, don't forget, fossil fuels globally is still 60% of electricity generation. So that could get pushed down all the way to 50, 40, 30, 20. And you may need who knows, you may need, you know, the last 5 or 10% to come from fossil fuels, whose primary role, for what it's worth, is that they're so incredibly easy to store. But again, as our storage technologies continue to get cheaper, more distributed, much larger, even that role of fossil fuels will start to reduce.
Tom : [00:30:21] I want to invite Paul to come in in a minute. But I mean, given that reality, and that's very persuasively point made, it's so interesting. I mean, it reminds me a little bit of the LA wildfires, right? I mean, we were so on the back foot with the narrative that somehow almost losing a great American city became about how DEA meant there were no water in the fire trucks, rather than about how we're warming the planet and creating the conditions for fire. And here again, this is a place where the narrative should be presumably about innovation, investment and transformation. And actually, it's about how we've gone too far on renewables. So we keep losing this narrative battle. But given what you've said out there, in terms of the parameters around the fact that renewables can go further, that there is stuff around the infrastructure and the grid that needs to be invested in. How do we push back on this narrative? Where do you see the points that we should begin to sort of talk more coherently about what this transition is really about
Kingsmill Bond: [00:31:11] So I think one of the major angles that we've been looking at recently at Ember is energy security. And here we are moving into a more fragile world where people are more nervous about importing their fossil fuels every single day and burning them every single day. And of course, this is where homegrown renewables come into the fore because you can't tariff the sun, as it were. You can't switch off the wind. And as people are getting more nervous about the the fragility of fossil fuel imports than I think there's a very powerful narrative to be made that they should be deploying their own homegrown resources. And don't forget, again, we did a note on this recently, so the numbers are top of my head. 37% of primary energy demand is imported fossil fuels, and that goes up to 75% in Spain and Italy and 90% in Morocco. And, you know, plenty of countries are desperately dependent upon imported fossil fuels. So this is a way to escape that dependency and get some homegrown energy, which then saves you from the risks of this stuff being cut off at the as we struggle with the end of the Pax Americana.
Paul: [00:32:24] I just want to ask the question that you come across when you meet people on energy prices. Now, as I understand, Spain has actually had some pretty cheap electricity with a lot of renewables. People sometimes complain about the cost of electricity in the UK. What's the role, if any, of renewables in electricity costs? Just because that's the question I get most often people talk to me about the.
Kingsmill Bond: [00:32:43] Theory is that low Aey, or low production costs of solar and wind will find their way into electricity prices that will drive electricity prices down and that will encourage electrification. That's what should be happening now. It's not happening. It is happening in China. It is happening in various different jurisdictions. These low costs are finding their way into electricity prices, but it's not happening everywhere. And there are kind of there are three three reasons why this is not happening. The first is that you've got regulatory structures, which in the UK for example, price electricity still off gas. And this famous analysis done by Simon Evans showing that, you know, in over 90% of cases electricity is still priced off gas. So you need you need regulatory change. They have to break free from that you know. The second reason then is you've got all these legacy costs which are loaded onto electricity. So for example, the contract for difference programs and various different programs in the UK back in, you know, back in the day, still getting load on, loaded onto electricity. And then the third and this is the one the fossil fuels love to focus on is the fact that the renewables require you to spend more on upgrading your grades and connecting the stuff that, let us not forget, it's just one of the three components. And I think the key, in fact, is to to solve the first of these, the pricing of gas. And you will see then in the UK, in other locations, electricity prices starting to fall.
Paul: [00:34:11] Okay. So I've got to come on to the general question. And, you know, in a way I want to thank the the poor people of Iberia for for bringing to our attention grids in about a quarter of a century working on climate change. I'm dazzled at how little time I've spent hearing about reading, about learning about grids. And I guess this is in part because they're sort of typically managed by 200 governments or something, and they sit behind a kind of wall of government, and you don't hear about them. Is that.
Tom : [00:34:39] Right?
Kingsmill Bond: [00:34:40] Yeah. I mean, in fairness, people have been saying for for a number of years before this outage that grids were the key bottleneck.
Tom : [00:34:47] It's just you've not been paying attention, Paul, that's been out there. You see it? Says.
Kingsmill Bond: [00:34:51] Have you in any way?
Tom : [00:34:53] I was. No, I just saw my opportunity. I know that's not what you were saying.
Kingsmill Bond: [00:34:56] No, I'm just saying that, you know, the bottlenecks of grace have been an issue, and the eeaS wrote a report in 2023 about this and did a recent update looking at the issue. And the point is, is pretty simple, like we need to build grids more rapidly, a little bit more rapidly than we have done in the past. And that's running up against a lot of opposition, because people don't appreciate having pylons across the countryside and don't necessarily want to have more grades. And we as societies need to we need to make decision. Do we want to build this system out and have clean local electricity, which is stable and safe, or do we want to continue to be dependent upon the old system? So grids are incredibly important. But the good news here again is that there's lots of new, what they call grid enhancing technologies coming along. So again, not not to get too technical, but you can get more electricity through the same wires by deploying software essentially, and you can upgrade the wires, keep the same grids, you can upgrade the wires and get 2 or 3 times as much electricity through the same space. And you can deploy batteries at both ends. And you can digitize all of these so-called grid enhancing technologies enable you to get more for less. And I think that's, again, a very exciting opportunity for for people also to make money. Again, this is the point. If you read all these worthy pieces of analysis about how hard it is to expand grids and how we need to, as the IEA seem to double our CapEx on grids. Well, okay. Great. I mean, that's what capitalism is very good at generally. You know, we need to be building more transformers. We need to be building more cables. We need more innovation, and we need policy action to make this happen.
Tom : [00:36:41] So this is really interesting. Thank you. And I think I know we're coming to the end of our time that we have with you. I'd just like to ask you the question. You've been such a compelling advocate for the fact that the energy transition is unstoppable. There are those who are using the example of this blackout and others to say, that's not true. How would you respond to that?
Kingsmill Bond: [00:36:58] I would say that there have been constant problems in the deployment of this and any other technology. And the question is, do you allow those problems to act as a ceiling or do you solve the problem? So if you go back, for example, to the electricity generation, the first electricity generation in Pearl Street in New York, you know, Thomas Edison used to have engineers on standby all the time because the flipping machines broke down all the time, and they poured pollution into the atmosphere, and it didn't work. But of course, they constantly innovated. London, famously in in 1920 had, you know, 20 or 30 different systems operating and they weren't talking to each other. But we figured it out. And I think that's the point, that we can either encounter problems and then give up, or we encounter problems and we solve them. And, um, you know, that's exactly what we have done for 30 or 40 years. And that's what we will continue to do. And I think the other point here is that this is let us not forget, this is also a race to the top. So every major country across the world is trying to solve these problems. Those that fail, fail. Those who succeed rise to greatness. So, you know, there is a very powerful geopolitical reason and dimension why we actually need to get on with solving these, these problems. Because if we don't, our strategic competitors will get cheaper electricity, cheaper and cheaper electricity and be able to push out our energy intensive industry. So yeah, there's I guess, Tom, it's like everything else in life, you know, you encounter a problem, you either give up or you or you double down. You solve.
Tom : [00:38:31] It. Absolutely. Well, we know we know which one you've been advocating.
Paul: [00:38:34] But Obama didn't get to the white House with. No, we can't, you know.
Tom : [00:38:38] That's right. Yeah. If we meet an obstacle, we'll give up. Kingsmill. Thank you. As ever. Always insightful, brilliant, very helpful and very encouraging about the fact that this transition is still unfolding, even though, as you say, no one ever said this was going to be easy, right? This transition is, by definition, going to be challenging. That doesn't mean we shouldn't do it. So thank you very much.
Kingsmill Bond: [00:38:57] Brilliant. Thank you.
Tom : [00:39:03] So great to hear from Kingsmill as ever. Such thoughtful and insightful analysis that we get from him. Paul, anything to add?
Paul: [00:39:10] I think we need to to really work harder to think about grids and to understand them. You know, if climate change is going to be resolved, it's going to need all these different things. One of the things back to this idea that the grid is a kind of a bit of a hidden or a camouflage thing. You know, you've either got electricity coming out of your socket or you know, the electric train is working or it's not. It's very kind of binary one zero. So it's very difficult for us to evaluate government performance except in terms of a sort of catastrophic failure point. And that's not very sophisticated. But if I just give one more shout out to to Greg Jackson of Octopus Energy saying that, you know, we're halfway across the road, dangerous to stop now. And I think that's that's absolutely key. We're in a process of upgrading our energy systems, and our grids are part of it. So I think we need to come back to this in future episodes. I hope we can go deeper with people more expert in grids to really understand the kind of political and economic dynamics of this critical technology, which sort of sits underneath everything. It's kind of like we spend all our time talking about the house, but we never talk about foundations.
Tom : [00:40:14] It's such a great point, and we think so little right about the grid infrastructure that sits, as you both said, behind everything. And I think that it's much more difficult. And I've talked to various people in in public policy positions, ministers and advisers, and they really struggle with this because, you know, people can kind of understand that we need to shift our energy generation to wind turbines and whatever else. And you can sort of marvel at the majesty of a wind turbine, although some people really don't like them, but people really get upset about, you know, NIMBYism around new infrastructure. Grid transmission lines distribution, as you've said, Christiana. So it's difficult. It ends up manifesting in really local challenges around how you upgrade this stuff, how you put the new infrastructure in place. But we're going to have to grapple with those difficult transition issues if we're actually going to move forward and be able to create the grid that can integrate this significant amount of renewables to get us to net zero. One thing I'd love to just touch on before I know we're coming towards the end of this episode is around the narrative, because we lose all the time in these narratives. Whenever these sorts of things happen. It's so easy for those forces that want to stop the transition that we're in to say, oh, this is all to do with the new transition. It's to do with renewables rather than the correct assessment, which is, as Kingsmill pointed out, so well towards the end of the interview. This is a difficult integration of new technology, but that doesn't mean it's beyond us. So it would be interesting just to think for a minute about many people maybe listening to this podcast who have others who've said to them, well, renewables aren't reliable. Look at what's just happened in Spain. How should people respond to that? And what is a thoughtful narrative that listeners can put out when they find themselves in that conversation?
Christiana: [00:41:59] Yeah. So if we think about this event, there is an important lesson that we can extrapolate from it. Way before the blackout, it has long been known that Europe and other countries or regions need to invest in stronger, smarter, more interconnected electricity grids and in much more energy storage capacity to be able to smoothen out the peaks and valleys of electricity, which could Increase as the demand for electricity grows with increased electrification of everything. Grids are undoubtedly the backbone of the electricity system, and they need to be brought into the 21st century. They need to be upgraded, expanded and digitalized to keep energy secure and affordable.
Paul: [00:42:57] Can I give a last word on this from Kingsmill himself? Because actually, after the interview, he dropped an email to us and I'm extremely excited by what he said, he said. If anything, I'm more optimistic that fossil fuel demand will be off the plateau by 2030. I'd say falling by 2030, he said, because of continued renewables costs, falls and growth. The initial data from 2025 suggests that Chinese coal demand for electricity is falling, and that is the largest fossil sector in the world and the pivot of the global system. So let's just celebrate the success of renewable energy in China and its ability to turn around that massive underlying global indicator of how emissions are going.
Tom : [00:43:44] As you said, Paul, I mean, grids, I think are going to be something we should return to because you made a point before we got on that. You've been working on climate change for 25 years and haven't really thought much about grids at all, and that certainly goes for me as well, and I think many people. But we're now at a point with renewables where we're going to have to crack this, and that is going to require more focus from all of us to really understand the issue. So hopefully we've moved forward at least a little bit on that conversation today.
Paul: [00:44:08] And there are brilliant engineers doing it, brilliant scientists, brilliant investors, people working with government. But it's just how can we help them?
Tom : [00:44:14] Absolutely. All right. So I think that probably brings us to a close for this week. Thank you both. Lovely to talk to you. Thank you everyone for joining us. As ever, we'll be back next week. I'll see you then.
Christiana: [00:44:24] Bye bye.
Paul: [00:44:25] Great to see you. Bye bye.